theradicalchild: (Singing Cowboy Hare)


(a big shoutout to [personal profile] loganberrybunny for inspiring me to watch this movie)

Based on the 1951 Lerner and Loewe American Western musical of the same name, the 1969 adaptation of Paint Your Wagon stars Lee Marvin as a prospector, Clint Eastwood as an amnesiac whom he recruits as his business partner, and Jean Seberg as one of a Mormon’s wives that he decides to sell to the highest bidder. I first saw this film as a rental in my town’s Blockbuster Video when that chain was still a thing, the title alone piquing my curiosity, the fact Clint Eastwood was in it being one of the sole things I knew about it. The following knowledge I would get about the film came from a brief spoof in The Simpsons episode “All Singing, All Dancing.”



Despite the title, the musical has nothing at all to do with literally painting wagons, with “paint your wagon” being a (very) dated expression meaning “to get things done.” Marvin’s character, Ben Rumson, dubs Eastwood’s “Pardner” as he recuperates, with a new tent town, “No Name City,” emerging when they discover gold. The male inhabitants become lonely from no female companionship until the mentioned Mormon husband comes and sells his wife Elizabeth to a drunken Rumson. A love triangle quickly emerges when Ben leaves his fiancé under Pardner’s care.

The latter portion of the movie involves Rumson and his men scheming to tunnel beneath No Name City to collect gold dust precipitating through the floorboards of saloons from paying customers, the only notable plot detail of which I had heard, courtesy my high school economics class, before I streamed this film. A zealous parson also comes to town in futile attempts to get its residents to abandon their sinful ways. Of course, many musical numbers abound, and while Marvin and Eastwood have never been known for their singing abilities, they did decently, with the former's “Wand’rin’ Star” probably being the high point of the film’s songs.



While I know this film gets its share of criticism, much justified, I found it an entertaining watch, with some initial themes like Rumson putting his business partners first and his apathy towards humanity resounding well with me. Mature content like references to venereal disease and prostitution also get some spotlight. Religious themes are front and center as well, given Rumson’s indifference towards God, the references to Mormonism and polygamy, and the ultrareligious preacher. Much of the film likely didn’t fly well with 1969 moviegoers (though modern audiences would probably find it less offensive than, say, Blazing Saddles). However, I think that time has vindicated it somewhat, and don’t regret seeing it.
theradicalchild: (Lambert the Sheepish Lion)


A color remake of the 1925 silent film, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer’s iconic version released in 1959, like its precursor based on Lew Wallace’s epic historical novel, stars the late Charlton Heston as the eponymous Judah Ben-Hur, a wealthy Jewish prince and merchant living in Jerusalem, twenty-five years after the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem, with both cities under the jurisdiction of the Roman Empire in the Judaea province. As in the book, Ben-Hur is condemned to galley slavery when loose roof tiles from a building from which he witnesses an imperial procession nearly kill the new governor.

Three years later, Ben-Hur is a rower for the flagship of Roman Consul Quintus Arrius, who adopts him as his son after a naval battle leaves the two stranded, and the former spends time in Rome, training as a charioteer. The former returns to Judaea, meeting the Magi Balthasar and Arab Sheik Ilderim, who want him to participate in a chariot race before the new Judean governor, Pontius Pilate, although Ben-Hur initially refuses. However, after learning the fates of his sister and mother, he changes his mind, seeking revenge against Messala in the film’s iconic chariot race recreated from the silent film version and loosely done so twoscore later in the podrace of Star Wars: The Phantom Menace.

The rest of the film has Ben-Hur returning to Judaea to find his mother and sister, also witnessing the trial and crucifixion of Jesus. Overall, this film easily qualifies as a classic, yet deviates from Wallace’s novel in many ways, like what happens with Messala, the post-chariot race portions involving Judah’s mother and sister, and the absence of the scenes at the beginning of the Three Magi meeting and what happens with the Hurs after Christ’s execution and beyond. Regardless, it stands well by itself and is a significant part of cinematic history that warrants viewership by any cinema buff.
theradicalchild: (Mother Nature (Woody Woodpecker))


This 1993 fantasy comedy stars Bill Murray as a snarky, cynical weatherman tasked with covering the annual Groundhog Day festival in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania, who becomes entrapped in a time loop that makes him relive the day endlessly. As he does so, he accustoms himself to the various situations in town that recur and discovers that he can make some good of his apparent supernatural situation. The film melds comedy and philosophy well, having some religious allegory and qualifying as iconic, the title and holiday becoming synonymous with unpleasant and repetitive situations. Some of the technology dates it to the first half of the 1990s, but it’s still a bucket-list movie.
theradicalchild: (Nurse Minnie and Doctor Mickey)
A few days ago I commented on Facebook on a post from a Jack Nicholson fan club regarding the production of one of the films he had starred in, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, the book version I had studied in college for one of my English classes, and stands as one of my all-time favorite pieces of American literature due to its commentary of the American mental healthcare system and antifeminist themes (though I'm fine with pre-twentieth century feminism). The actor himself actually responded to my comment positively and even invited me to DM and connect with him. Though, I'm still restricting my Facebook account to people I've met and known in real life. Really nice to get noticed like that, though, and I definitely want to see the film adaptation. It seems to be on Netflix, so maybe sometime in the near future.
theradicalchild: (Mr. Wolf)


The first live-action film based on Mattel’s iconic toy line, Barbie stars Margot Robbie as the eponymous doll who lives an idealized life in Barbieland but has an existential crisis and travels to the real world alongside her boyfriend Ken, played by Ryan Gosling, in a fish-out-of-water comedic setting. Mattel’s CEO, played by Will Ferrell, is alerted to their presence, thus seeking to recapture them. Ken further discovers the concept of patriarchy and returns to Barbieland to lead a male revolution, culminating in reconciliation between them and the ruling Barbies. Overall, this was one of the few films whose concept seemed terrible, given the source material, but ended up surprisingly enjoyable, with sound social commentary, and is worth a watch.
theradicalchild: (Statue of Liberty Scream)


The first Home Alone sequel, and the only one to feature a majority of the cast from the original film, starts similarly to its predecessor, with the McAllisters preparing for a Christmas trip to Florida, preceded by a school performance that goes wrong thanks again to Kevin’s older brother Buzz. This time, Kevin joins his family on the trip to the airport. However, circumstances divert him to a flight to New York City, where he stays at the Plaza Hotel, briefly meeting a future U.S. President and an adversarial concierge and bellhop portrayed by Tim Curry and Rob Schneider. Afterward, he again faces the fugitive Wet Bandits by boobytrapping his uncle’s residence-in-renovation. It’s structurally identical to the first film but decent in its way and likely better than its myriad sequels.

Home Alone

Dec. 25th, 2023 10:07 am
theradicalchild: (Marv Tarantula Scream)


The first installment of the Home Alone film series, directed by Chris Columbus, stars Macaulay Culkin as Kevin McCallister, part of a sizeable family planning to spend Christmas in Paris, although a scuffle with his older brother Buzz and consequential cleanup leads his father to throw away his ticket and passport accidentally. Coupled with a power outage in the middle of the night and a miscount of heads the following morning, Kevin is left stranded at home, which he must defend from a pair of thieves known as the Wet Bandits, portrayed by Joe Pesci and Daniel Stern. It rightfully stands as a holiday classic, with great music by John Williams, and has aged well.
theradicalchild: (Rudolph Crying)


Charles Dickens's classic novella A Christmas Carol likely sets the record for having the most film and television adaptations, among them the 1984 live-action made-for-TV version directed by Clive Donner, starring the late George Campbell Scott as the misanthropic Ebenezer Scrooge, who considers his payment of taxes to the British government his main contribution to society, being a thrifty businessman and not a people-person. Scrooge displays apathy towards the Christmas season at his nephew Fred Hollywell, son of his deceased older sister Fanny, and his current business partner Bob Cratchit, who replaced the long-dead Jacob Marley.

On Christmas Eve, the earthbound specter of Marley visits Scrooge and admonishes him that he will meet a similar fate if he doesn’t change his ways, warning that three spirits will come after midnight. First is the Ghost of Christmas Past, which shows Scrooge in his youth, beginning with his abandonment by his father at a boarding school after his mother died in childbirth. The Ghost of Christmas Present shows him the Cratchit family’s celebration of the holidays, with the disabled Tiny Tim vulnerable to early death, and his married nephew’s festivities. The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come shows Scrooge that nobody misses him after his demise, some even purloining his possessions, which makes him change his ways.

Overall, I believe this to be the definitive adaptation of Dickens’s story, which is one of few pieces of literature I would term a masterpiece, given that despite being written in the mid-nineteenth century, it’s still readable by contemporary standards (more so than the author’s other works), and has a timeless message that the well-to-do should be more compassionate towards the lesser-privileged and of high character. I have a minor issue with Fred not mourning or bequeathing his uncle’s property in the alternate future where Scrooge dies. However, the central theme, “God Bless Us, Everyone,” is one of the most beautiful pieces of seasonal music ever composed and had me cry happy tears. Very highly recommended.

Listen to the main theme yourself:

theradicalchild: (Jewish Wolf)


The 1971 film adaptation of the stage musical focuses on the poor Jewish milkman Tevye, portrayed by the late Chaim Topol, living in the Ukrainian village of Anatevka and facing the challenge of marrying off his five daughters amidst the growing tension in his community and Imperial Russia at large in 1905. The prospective husbands include Perchik, a radical Marxist from Kiev (now Kyiv); Lazar Wolf (which most characters pronounce “laser wolf”), a wealthy widowed butcher; and the poor tailor Motel Kamzoil. Following one of the daughter’s weddings, the local constable leads a pogrom against Anatevka, with the second half of the film focusing on the aftermath months later that culminates in the dispersement of the town population following a government decree.

As a musical, there are, of course, several notable tunes such as “Tradition,” “Matchmaker, Matchmaker,” “If I Were a Rich Man,” “Miracle of Miracles,” and “Sunrise, Sunset,” the last two being my personal favorites. A few seem padded with nonsensical words like “If I Were a Rich Man" (though it could be Yiddish or Hebrew). Regardless, most of the numbers are well-performed and certainly would not have sounded awkward even in the place and period where and when the movie occurs, given the soundtrack's Semitic feel. The film also deals with themes like Jewish tradition, with insight into their customs and relationships back in 1905. While the film is not without its flaws and has a forthcoming remake, I think the 1971 adaptation is good enough as it is.
theradicalchild: (Chickenhare and Meg)


The fifth and final Indiana Jones movie starring Harrison Ford as the eponymous archaeologist, college professor, and adventurer, the first entry of the franchise not directed by Steven Spielberg or conceived by George Lucas (but still produced by Lucasfilm), opens in 1944 during the Second World War when Indy and fellow archaeologist Basil Shaw try to retrieve the Lance of Longinus (used to pierce Jesus during his crucifixion) from the Nazis. During their tangle, Indy and Shaw obtain half of the film’s titular artifact, the Antikythera, or Archimedes’ Dial, which can reveal time fissures and allow for temporal travel.

Twenty-five years later, in 1969, Indy, now living in New York City and working for Hunter College, plans his retirement and is visited by Helena Shaw, Basil’s daughter, also Indy’s goddaughter, who is interested in the Dial, which sits in the college archives. While attempting to retrieve it, they encounter accomplices sent by the CIA and Jürgen Voller, an astrophysicist and former Nazi Indy encountered back in the opening scene, now working for NASA’s Apollo program. Jones is framed for the murder of two colleagues and reunites with his old sidekick Sallah, now an NYC cab driver, who helps him flee the country.

A scramble for the other half of the Dial takes Indy across the world, with Voller intending to use it to travel back to 1939, kill Hitler, take over as Führer, and try to lead Germany through World War II himself. While critics have suggested the fifth film isn’t as “thrilling” as its precursors, I thought there was enough action and some good twists. A concern I had upon seeing the trailers was the absence of Karen Allen’s character and Indy’s love interest, Marion Ravenwood, and Shia LaBeouf’s character, Mutt Williams (both critical in the fourth movie). However, the film does address them (and I won't spoil anything), and I thought the movie was a fun conclusion to the Indiana Jones saga.
theradicalchild: (Pizza the Hutt)


I haven't played any of the games, and don't know if I will since my backlog is massive, but it's a decently entertaining film, with the animatronics being ugly-cute and all.
theradicalchild: (Hopus Pocus)


There are some good secrets and backstory regarding Albus Dumbledore and his family, and the film's visual direction is gorgeous like in its predecessors, but the change of actor for Gellert Grindelwald is sort of jarring and doesn't have any in-universe explanation. Regardless, I am somewhat disappointed the Fantastic Beasts films are probably over for the time since it flopped financially.
theradicalchild: (Hopus Pocus)


The first Fantastic Beasts sequel focuses on magizoologist Newt Scamander as he joins then-Hogwarts-Headmaster Albus Dumbledore (back in 1927) to chase down escaped dark wizard Gellert Grindelwald as he tries to amass a pure-blood wizarding army in a more-divided wizarding world. The visual direction and continuity nods to the Harry Potter books and movies are good, along with some decent twists, but the film doesn't actually have a lot to do with the eponymous "crimes" of the titular sorcerer, and his motivations at points are actually just, given his foretelling of the Second World War among Muggles, for instance.
theradicalchild: (Hopus Pocus)


The first film of the Fantastic Beasts series, a prequel series to author J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter books (and as she wrote the screenplay, it's canon to what she would term her Wizarding World), follows Newt Scamander as he attempts to wrangle his loose beasts in 1920s New York City while dealing with an antimagic movement arising in the country. Definitely a good start to the film franchise that expands upon the mythos of Rowling's literary world.
theradicalchild: (Scotty Can't Reach the Controls)


The first movie based on Star Trek, originally intended to be the pilot episode of a sequel series to The Original Series, focuses on a mysterious entity known as V'Ger engulfing everything in its path and threatening Earth, with Admiral Kirk gathering his old Enterprise crew to counter it. Director Robert Wise took heavy inspiration from 2001: A Space Odyssey, with plenty of drawn-out sequences showing off the film's special effects at the time. Jerry Goldsmith composed the soundtrack, its cornerstone being "Life Is a Dream," which would be later used as the central theme to The Next Generation. The film does show its age in many respects but did well to carry on the plot of the TOS cast.
theradicalchild: (Autobot Symbol)


I watched this last Saturday but didn't have the time to post my review, although I don't feel really passionate about it or other films in the series. It's a sequel to Bumblebee and a prequel to Michael Bay's Transformer films, and it has good effects and action, which are the high point of the film, though the human subplot is run-of-the-mill.

Also, another reason to use this image:



Bumblebee

Aug. 19th, 2023 01:39 pm
theradicalchild: (Autobot Symbol)


I'm starting to rewatch these films since Rise of the Beasts came out recently, and I want to experience them chronologically. The eponymous Transformer arrives on Earth after he and the Autobots lose a war against the Decepticons on their home planet Cybertron to set up a base there, with a girl named Charlie finding him disguised as a Volkswagen Beetle, and two Decepticons are sent to Earth as well to ensure he doesn't set up resistance against their order. Has a good 1980s setting with some of the good music of the era, and I enjoyed the movie overall.
theradicalchild: (Jean-Luc Picard)


Takes place twenty years after Star Trek: Nemesis, and focuses on the titular retired Starfleet Admiral Jean-Luc Picard, who is thrust back into service for several reasons, and reunites with most of his crew from The Next Generation and its respective films, not to mention some new faces. The second season brings his old nemesis Q back into the picture as Picard and his companions are drawn back into the twenty-first century to ensure one of his ancestors gets into a space expedition as planned, and the third mainly involves the resurgent Borg. Definitely an enjoyable series with plenty of twists and actions, and makes me wonder what direction the Next Generation Trek characters will follow after Picard's events.
theradicalchild: (Dungeons & Dragons Dice)


A significant improvement over previous DnD films in that it's canon to the Forgotten Realms and is a good mixture of action, comedy, and fantasy, more enjoyable than playing the tabletop game and whatever DnD video games I've played (with my experience limited to Baldur's Gate, but it was the original PC version that hasn't aged well). A shame it underperformed at the box office, so there probably won't be any more films, and I'm not sure if the planned television series will go through, either.
theradicalchild: (Rocket)
The Guardian members in front of a colorful explosion

The first Guardians sequel focuses on the titular intergalactic hero team as they travel the cosmos and Peter Quill, a.k.a. Star-Lord, learns more about his parentage. Not as good as the first film, but I still enjoyed it.

Profile

theradicalchild: (Default)
The Radical Child

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34 567
89 1011 12 13 14
15 161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 05:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios