theradicalchild: (Cheerful Annabelle)
2024-09-13 08:11 am

The Power of Reconciliation

The Power of ReconciliationThe Power of Reconciliation by Justin Welby
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

While I was still attending a United Methodist church with my father (which has since become a Global Methodist church after its split from the UMC), I occasionally went to my town's Episcopalian church due to a combination of my estrangement from my dad and my view of the Anglican Communion as liberalized Catholicism, in minor part due to my sexual liberalism and my father's church's growing intolerance towards nonheterosexuality. After obtaining vehicular freedom, I made The Episcopal Church my new denomination and eventually became baptized as a member. To date, my town's Episcopalian church remains one of very few places where I'm fully accepted.

I've mostly known during the past decade that The Episcopal Church was significantly more progressive than other Christian denominations, having Katharine Jefferts Schori as its first female Presiding Bishop and her successor, the outgoing Michael Bruce Curry, as its first African-American one. I had read Curry's Love Is the Way, and while I agreed with its general titular message, I did have some significant disagreements with him, far from theological, but more political in terms of the line between traditional family values (which had burned me throughout my life) and following Man's law, along with the standard belief among most American blacks of nonwhite infallibility.

Two years later, Justin Welby, the incumbent Archbishop of Canterbury and high primate of the Anglican Communion (and therefore my denomination's equivalent of Pope), wrote The Power of Reconciliation, which opens with a story of an ikon (an alternate spelling of icon) present in Stalingrad in December 1942 during the Second World War of the Virgin Mary and Jesus. He notes, very rightfully, that peace is always preferrable to war, and that the former is the maturity of politics and the latter the failure. Welby elaborates that death by violences spreads throughout subsequent human generations, and that historically, ancestry has defined people.

The Archbishop of Canterbury continues by mentioning different ways in which one can find an objective identity, including declarations about oneself and through relationships with others. He indicates that overreach and overspeed can mar reconciliation, since in the former case, goals tend to be unrealistic, and in the latter, peacemaking isn't an overnight process and takes time. Welby notes several obstacles to reconciliation like the need for sacrifice, perceived honor and shame, and neurochemistry due to various stimuli. He indicates various African civil wars, including those in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire), and that different nations across the world have divergent views of historical events.

Welby elaborates on the six Rs of the Coventry model: researching, relating, relieving, risking, reconciling, and resourcing (though I was often confused had to look online to actually determine said specific Rs since they often aren't explicitly stated throughout the book). He then moves from the theoretical to the highly practical, noting the vast challenge of difference that social media has greatly amplified, which he says should create curiosity rather than division. The Archbishop highlights a niche quote from Dr Martin Luther King Jr that Presiding Bishop Curry had mentioned that eleven o'clock Sunday morning is the most segregated hour in America, that Christians tend to go to churches full of people like themselves.

The author briefly highlights the "non-apology," an insincere apology that puts blame on victims for being offended and tend to include "if." From personal experience, I would elaborate upon this that apologies that include "but" or an excuse are non-apologies as well. He mentions the need to "disagree well," which in my case has often been difficult given that others with whom I have clashed in the past, were it in person or online, have tended not to be very civil about various disagreements. Throughout his book, he demonstrates that he is definitely with the times, given his references to various modern films like Miss Congeniality, Django Unchained, and writer J.K. Rowling.

The Archbishop highlights three examples of where reconciliation is needed, the first being climate change that threatens the habitability of major portions of the planet, especially low-lying areas and the Tropics, with individual needs of countries often not considered, along with the need for fair trade, stopping conflicts, and green technology. Second is racial and ethnic differences and divisions, which he notes are often born out of common fiction and where he cleverly weaves in the video games Tetris and Minecraft, the former being "old news" and the latter new. The third is where hatred is frequently considered the greater good, Welby noting that governments need to accommodate and adapt to divided societies.

The author concludes by mentioning that reconciliation requires courage not just from the peacebuilder but more for those caught in conflicts, noting that peace needs to be made with enemies and that the stronger must help the weaker. He ends with warnings of potential cyber and nuclear wars, which I believe could become very real within the next few years. In the end, I enjoyed Archbishop Welby's book, even though I have some disagreements with him (like being an apologist for a certain group whose name rhymes with "fat wives' bladder"). Regardless, it's an excellent philosophical read for any Christian regardless of denomination.

View all my reviews
theradicalchild: (Anglican Ram Priest Reading)
2024-06-11 07:38 am

Book Review - Love Is the Way

Love is the Way: Holding on to Hope in Troubling TimesLove is the Way: Holding on to Hope in Troubling Times by Michael B. Curry
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Throughout my life, I was on and off religious, pretty much forced into The United Methodist Church when I moved to where I have lived since 1988. My family eventually stopped going, and I tread the line between agnostic and atheist for over a decade. I started going to a country Methodist church again with my parents circa 2006, then only my father. Given our eventual estrangement, however, I began to fully attend my town's Episcopalian church towards the end of the last decade, given its reputation as one of the more liberal Christian denominations and my personal political and social liberalization.

African-American author Michael Bruce Curry has been the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church in America since 2015 (with his predecessor being female). He begins with the story of his ancestors, with his grandparents having been part of the Great Migration of Black America between 1916 and 1970. Curry touches on his family's religious background, highlighting events like one of his grandmothers telling him when he was young after he mocked a zealous preacher, "You don't laugh at anybody else's religion. You respect the Lord however he comes." His book features many excellent quotes from the Bible and historical luminaries like Martin Luther King Jr., such as, "We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools."

While Curry's book has some fascinating factoids, such as his preaching at Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's wedding, he becomes somewhat political throughout it. For example, he is critical of ex-President Donald Trump's zero-tolerance immigration policies, possibly citing Exodus 23:9 ("You shall not oppress an alien...") and opposing separating immigrant families (largely shared then by both conservative and liberal Christian denominations). This issue is my main point of contention with his work, as I believe that following Man's law is as crucial as following God's, and that the Bible does not unequivocally endorse traditional family values, as seen in passages like Matthew 10:34-37 (which includes the statement, "Your biggest enemies will be the members of your own family").

One needs also note that religions and their respective texts have been grounds for various atrocities and crimes throughout human history. For instance, Exodus 22:18 says, "Suffer not a witch to live," a possible justification for the Salem Witch Trials, and others like Adolf Hitler probably had religious motivations for genocide, maybe, "Whatever you do, do it for the glory of God" (1 Corinthians 10). As one who has suffered emotionally and psychologically at the hands of his flesh and blood, furthermore, I strongly believe that the blood of the Covenant is far thicker than that of the womb, would have gladly accepted alternative guardians, and have today found far more accepting nonbiological families.

Curry does mention far less polarizing political figures like the late Senator Robert Kennedy and abolitionist William Wilberforce, who helped peacefully end slavery in the British Empire. He further elaborates on his relatives, mentioning his comatic, then mute mother Dorothy, and his near-death experience when he got his head stuck in a couch. However, he succumbs at points to widespread theoretical nonwhite infallibility, mentioning the alleged innocence of the late black boxer Rubin "Hurricane" Carter (with the 1999 biopic about him, for instance, having inaccuracy that would lead to one of his former opponents suing the film's director).

The presiding bishop draws an intriguing analogy between the anti-apartheid priest Desmond Tutu and singer Dolly Parton. He further mentions the Swiss-American psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross' namesake five stages of grief (which I believe can vary significantly as an autistic) and discusses bargaining with God. The bishop correctly points out that Anglicans/Episcopalians were once aligned with mainstream historical society and the Catholic Church on issues such as Native Americans and black slavery. Additionally, he engages in more political discourse, incorporating Dr. King's insightful quote, "It is appalling that the most segregated hour of Christian America is eleven o'clock on Sunday morning."

Overall, while I agree with Bishop Curry on major social and theological points (for instance, nonheterosexual relationships and love, overall, "being the way"), I highly disagree with him politically (even despite considering myself more open-minded than I was during the 2000s). However, I don't disagree with him to the point of many lapsed Catholic American politicians regarding the Pope (and in my opinion, they should instead be Episcopalian, given Curry's perspectives and my view of Anglicanism as liberalized Catholicism). As a result, I skimmed over many portions, but genuine members of the rarely-mentioned Religious Left will adore his book. I identify more with the "Religious Center" and believe that in Christ, there is no Left or Right, just as there is no East or West, black or white, heterosexual or nonheterosexual, male or female, and so forth.

View all my reviews